From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan  4 12:01:55 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990E316A420;
	Fri,  4 Jan 2008 12:01:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B8C13C44B;
	Fri,  4 Jan 2008 12:01:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192)
	id 714351A4D83; Fri,  4 Jan 2008 03:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 03:59:27 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20080104115927.GJ76698@elvis.mu.org>
References: <fljin9$crb$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080104011821.GD76698@elvis.mu.org>
	<9bbcef730801040325y197aa7f6s134436dcc79d8aeb@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9bbcef730801040325y197aa7f6s134436dcc79d8aeb@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Threads and signals
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:01:55 -0000

* Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> [080104 03:23] wrote:
> On 04/01/2008, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > You need to block/unblock signals or use sigwait.
> >
> > So basically your code will look something like:
> 
> >   defer_signals();
> 
> Interesting approach - should I also use it to ensure only one of the
> threads gets the signal?

Certainly.

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein