From owner-freebsd-security  Fri May 11  0:53:36 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.morning.ru (ns.morning.ru [195.161.98.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E5F37B422
	for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 11 May 2001 00:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from poige@morning.ru)
Received: from NIC1 ([195.161.98.236])
	by ns.morning.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA92131;
	Fri, 11 May 2001 15:53:25 +0800 (KRAST)
	(envelope-from poige@morning.ru)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 15:56:08 +0700
From: Igor Podlesny <poige@morning.ru>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52 Beta/7) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091
Organization: Morning Network
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1182362066.20010511155608@morning.ru>
To: Jussi Jaurola <gobbe@gobbe.net>
Cc: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re[4]: preventing direct root login on telnetd
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105111044280.4031-100000@gobbe.net>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105111044280.4031-100000@gobbe.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org



> Oh yeah, sorry :) I misunderstanded your meaning.

> But why dont you just
> use ssh?

i do -- you're mistaken again -- it was another person's question...

>  It's much more reliable and better then telnet.

-- 
 Igor                            mailto:poige@morning.ru



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message