From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 22 12:51:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441A216A4CE for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 12:51:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.druber.com (dsl-216-129-135-2.lightband.com [216.129.135.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8459043D31 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 12:51:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dswartz@druber.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.druber.com [127.0.0.1]) by sphinx.druber.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB8C2080; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:51:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sphinx.druber.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sphinx.druber.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13442-03; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:51:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from manticore.druber.com (unknown [10.0.0.22]) by sphinx.druber.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A149207E; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:51:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040822084834.01b2ade0@10.0.0.2> X-Sender: dswartz@10.0.0.2 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:50:58 -0400 To: vivek@khera.org From: Dan Swartzendruber Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at druber.com cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: postfix 2.0 vs 2.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 12:51:01 -0000 Pardon me if this is obvious, but I am extremely confused. I've just recently installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 and found mail/postfix as postfix-2.0.16 as well as mail/postfix-current as postfix 2.0.14. Yet, the ports info on freshports.org seems to indicate that mail/postfix should be 2.1.4! I've downloaded the tarball, but I'm not sure what's wrong with the port info on my system, nor how to fix it. Can you lend a clue?