Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 Jul 2003 11:17:27 +0100
From:      Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
To:        Oliver Fromme <olli@secnetix.de>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NFS problem FreeBSD vs NetApp Filer using tomcat / java 
Message-ID:  <200307091117.aa12894@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Jul 2003 11:13:49 %2B0200." <200307090913.h699DnK3053575@lurza.secnetix.de> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200307090913.h699DnK3053575@lurza.secnetix.de>, Oliver Fromme write
s:
>Someone asked me off-list whether I use the "interruptible"
>flag for the NFS mounts, and suggested switching it off.
...
>It is my understanding that the interruptible flag has only
>an effect when a signal is delivered to a process which is
>blocked on NFS I/O.  Or am I wrong?

Yes, the interruptible flag should only have an effect when the
process receives a signal while waiting on an NFS response. Maybe
it is possible that the progess is sending itself a signal? NFS
checks for SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGHUP, SIGKILL and SIGQUIT.

If you are using the -s/soft option then that is quite different -
there are well-known effects where an unusually long delay from
the server can trigger occasional EINTR errors.

Ian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200307091117.aa12894>