Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:57:20 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <201206182157.q5ILvKna010233@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:37:55 %2B0200." <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206181829210.99007@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> GNU communist licence for C compiler is not bad at all (contrary to other ......^^^^^^^^^ ......^^^^^^^^^ > software). I & many others _Know_ what BSD & FSF licenses are. Don't wwant repeated nonsense about 'communism'. If you didn't subscribe http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain before the GCC V Clang decision was made, your views now irrelevant. If you still must emit noise about licenses subscribe http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy Best subscribe & follow up about communism to http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat or /dev/null Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206182157.q5ILvKna010233>