Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:43:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Josef El-Rayes <j.el-rayes@daemon.li> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: www/53803: news article about freebsd's role in sco case Message-ID: <200306262243.h5QMhLAk000580@daemon.li> Resent-Message-ID: <200306262250.h5QMoGSC063329@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 53803
>Category: www
>Synopsis: news article about freebsd's role in sco case
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-www
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: update
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Thu Jun 26 15:50:15 PDT 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Josef El-Rayes
>Release: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD daemon.li 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 23 20:51:01 CEST 2003 shammer@daemon.li:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>Description:
In this rather evangelistic than technically oriented article,
author Jim Rapoza reviews FreeBSD's and the other BSD's chances caused by
the stirr of the SCO vs. Linux case.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
--- press.xml.diff begins here ---
--- press.xml.orig Fri Jun 27 00:36:05 2003
+++ press.xml Fri Jun 27 00:40:03 2003
@@ -16,6 +16,17 @@
<month>
<name>June</name>
+ <story>
+ <name>Is it time for BSD?</name>
+ <url>http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1135078,00.asp</url>;
+ <site-name>eWeek</site-name>
+ <site-url>http://www.eweek.com</site-url>;
+ <date>23 June 2003</date>
+ <author>Jim Rapoza</author>
+ <p>In this rather evangelistic than technically oriented article,
+author Jim Rapoza reviews FreeBSD's and the other BSD's chances caused by
+the stirr of the SCO vs. Linux case.</p>
+ </story>
<story>
<name>Basic Security Measures for FreeBSD</name>
--- press.xml.diff ends here ---
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200306262243.h5QMhLAk000580>