From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 00:36:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255F516A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:36:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 921B743D7E for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:36:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 67566 invoked by uid 399); 29 Dec 2005 00:36:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 00:36:45 -0000 Message-ID: <43B32F9C.9080809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:36:44 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Florent Thoumie References: <1134927080.744.14.camel@cream.xbsd.org> <43B1F218.2080408@FreeBSD.org> <200512280310.25988.flz@xbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200512280310.25988.flz@xbsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d/ldconfig change X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:36:52 -0000 Florent Thoumie wrote: > I don't much care about where it's stored, I figured out that etc/ was a > good candidate because /etc/ had already ld.so.conf but libdata is fine > with me. Ok, let's go with that unless someone else has a better idea. > Note that I modified BSD.local.dist in latest version of the patch. I did after I finished reading the thread. :) Good catch. >>> Here's what I was thinking about (see attached patch). >>> >>> This way, I can imagine a USE_LDCONFIG variable containing >>> directories and bsd.port.mk would just : >>> >>> .if defined(USE_LDCONFIG) echo ${USE_LDCONFIG} > >>> ${PREFIX}/etc/ld.so.conf.d/${UNIQUENAME} .endif >> I would use touch here, but I won't quibble. > > Not sure how you could do the same thing with only touch. Ok, I think I'm confused about one part of the patch or another then. It seems from your rc.d/ldconfig patch that all you are looking at are the names of the files in the ldconfig_local_d directories, but it occurs to me now that just the names won't really help, you actually need to store the paths to feed to ldconfig somewhere, which I presume is what you were going to include in the USE_LDCONFIG variable. Am I right so far? If so, then I don't understand how your patch to rc.d/ldconfig is going to work, but I may be missing something. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection