From owner-cvs-lib Thu May 7 10:28:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA23629 for cvs-lib-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 10:28:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-lib) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA23609; Thu, 7 May 1998 10:28:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA07858; Thu, 7 May 1998 10:28:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) cc: Julian Elischer , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libftpio ftpio.c In-reply-to: Your message of "07 May 1998 18:58:21 +0200." Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 10:28:08 -0700 Message-ID: <7854.894562088@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Does that mean renaming all functions as well? What will happen to > software which currently uses libftpio? It will at the very least be > necessary to change the Makefiles (-lfetch instead of -lftpio)... Like I said, I'd handle the other 2 major consumers of libftpio if somebody wanted to do libftpio and fetch. It will be a bit of a pain from the apps programmer's perspective, but better to do it now before too many apps are using it. - Jordan