From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 20 05:50:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C5F16A4CE for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 05:50:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B66043D4C for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 05:50:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i2KDoMbv068755 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 05:50:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2KDoMFd068754; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 05:50:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 05:50:22 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200403201350.i2KDoMFd068754@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Thomas-Martin Seck Subject: Re: ports/60700: squid cannot be built with transparent-ipf support X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Thomas-Martin Seck List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 13:50:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/60700; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Thomas-Martin Seck To: Kirill Ponomarew Cc: Subject: Re: ports/60700: squid cannot be built with transparent-ipf support Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:14:14 +0100 * Kirill Ponomarew (krion@FreeBSD.org): > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 03:50:04AM +0900, Hidenori Ishikawa wrote: > > > > >Number: 60700 > > >Category: ports > > >Synopsis: squid cannot be built with transparent-ipf support > > >Confidential: no > > >Severity: serious > > >Priority: high > > >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs > > >State: open > > Could you please investigate this problem ? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/60700 FreeBSD does not install ipf's headers into the base system anymore, see PR 44148 for details. Someone (Darren Reed himself?) will have to put them into an ipf-headers port I guess which can then be added as a dependency if needed.