Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:25:32 +0000 From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>, Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-www@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: www/en/releases/5.2R/todo.sgml illegible Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.1.20031125132130.02dffc78@popserver.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <20031125131944.GJ66785@submonkey.net> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031125130644.02dd4bb0@popserver.sfu.ca> <5.0.2.1.1.20031125130644.02dd4bb0@popserver.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 13:19 25/11/2003 +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: >On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:11:00PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: > > -<!ENTITY status.untested "<font color=yellow>Needs testing</font>"> > > +<!ENTITY status.untested "<font color=green>Needs testing</font>"> > >In true bikeshed fashion, I have to disagree on your choice of colour. >Using green here implies that that task is done - I'd rather use >orange/amber but I don't know if that works in most/any browsers or not. To be honest, I don't care what the colour is, as long as it's legible; I picked green because it was the first colour which came to mind, but I agree that it does give the wrong implication. Orange works for me. Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.2.1.1.20031125132130.02dffc78>