From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 13 12:36:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8425F16A4BF for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (coyote.seekingfire.com [24.72.10.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7743443FE1 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:36:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: from blues.seekingfire.prv (blues.seekingfire.prv [192.168.23.211]) by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358CA2AF for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:36:25 -0600 (CST) Received: (from tillman@localhost) by blues.seekingfire.prv (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h8DJaOM19171 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:36:24 -0600 Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:36:24 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030913133624.W13273@seekingfire.com> References: <200309082359.07548.ajacoutot@lphp.org> <20030908161045.C11841@seekingfire.com> <42065386.1063047726@[192.168.10.11]> <20030908181529.P11841@seekingfire.com> <1063359316.2838.18.camel@cronos.home.vsb> <20030912070057.E13273@seekingfire.com> <1063465291.9570.2.camel@cronos.home.vsb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1063465291.9570.2.camel@cronos.home.vsb>; from n.b@myrealbox.com on Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 05:01:31PM +0200 X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers Subject: Re: nis security (DES passwords) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 19:36:27 -0000 On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Guy Van Sanden wrote: > I was looking arround for this, and I found that Kerberos uses DES > encryption, John (on my sytem) reports it rather weak: > I'm now using MD5 passwords in NIS. > > Yet it seems the consensus that Kerberos is secure, am I missing > something? Yes :-) 1. Kerberos can use a variety of encryption methods 2. With NIS, arbitrary users can run John against the password database. With Kerberos, they can't because they don't have the Kerberos database to run John against. -T -- Beauty is not diminished by being shared. - Robert Heinlein