From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jun 16 13:18:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA11091
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 13:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA11082
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 13:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA01159 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 13:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199606162017.NAA01159@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: linux 2.0 vs FreeBSD -current's SMP support
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 1996 13:17:49 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Any has a clue as to any advantages/disadvantages on Linux's SMP support?

For instance does Linux 2.0 support kernel reentrancy ?


   Tnks,
	Amancio