From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 19 04:44:34 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA08619 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 04:44:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA08613 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 04:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199606191144.EAA08613@freefall.freebsd.org> Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA051944612; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 21:43:32 +1000 From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: Keith Bostic: MS Press Release - Common Internet File System (CIFS) To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 21:43:31 +1000 (EST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199606190603.IAA12028@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Jun 19, 96 08:03:49 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In some mail from J Wunsch, sie said: > > As Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Makes me ill. I know it doesn't support anything but connection-based > > authentication tokens, doesn't support sliding window (even fixed window, > > as in Novell's NCP "packetburst" beats the hell out of it), and will > > in general turn the whole net into a transport for single packet > > request/response. > > They first have to learn that TCP connections are not to be closed > with RST, but with FIN instead. :-] Read the TCP RFC. TCP is meant to be closed with both.