From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun  6 12:05:55 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEF31065840
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  6 Jun 2009 12:05:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
	[IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384138FC24
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  6 Jun 2009 12:05:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n56C5dhU091261;
	Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:05:39 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id
	n56C5dWR091258; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:05:39 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:05:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Ruben de Groot <mail25@bzerk.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090606101422.GB10672@ei.bzerk.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906061405130.91225@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906040113270.28607@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<200906050924.23167.kirk@strauser.com>
	<b79ecaef0906050950m53fda524i5652f57b1ac389ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<200906051208.43135.kirk@strauser.com>
	<b79ecaef0906051323s64a89fe2x134290524b633978@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A29EBB7.9090100@strauser.com> <20090606094648.GA10672@ei.bzerk.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0906061148350.90514@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20090606101422.GB10672@ei.bzerk.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Date representation as YY/DDD or YYYY/DDD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:06:12 -0000

> rsync isn't bloated and it's well written IMO. It still does only one job, and
> it does it well. As you say, most common tasks can still be done with only
> short options. This would change if some developer decided to add other,
> unrelated functionality. But that's harder if you want to maintain short options
> for the common tasks.
> Having only long options would place no such restrictions on bloating.
>
what program you mean about having only long options?