From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul 27 13:29:25 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C90E37B401
	for <freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU
	[128.205.32.2])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D440F43FDF
	for <freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU)
Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	h6RKTObr011917;	Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:29:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from kensmith@localhost)
	by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6RKTOa6011916;
	Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:29:24 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:29:23 -0400
From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU>
To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= <jonny@jonny.eng.br>
Message-ID: <20030727202923.GD11351@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
References: <20030727192724.GA10869@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
	<3F24313F.7040109@jonny.eng.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F24313F.7040109@jonny.eng.br>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org
cc: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU>
Subject: Re: Mirror Site Requirements - Final Draft?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp <freebsd-hubs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hubs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 20:29:26 -0000

On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 05:08:31PM -0300, Joo Carlos Mendes Lus wrote:

> And isn't once a day too much for 
> something that generally do not changes after beeing released?

That I'm "waffling" over. :-/

If the mirror-announce@ list works well enough then syncing once a
day for mostly static data is, as you point out, wasteful.  But
once a week would be too much of a delay at Release Time.  I'm
inclined to leave this requirement as-is for now and review it
later, after mirror-announce@ has been in place for a while.

-- 
						Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to      |       kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
  there, funny things are everywhere.   |
                      - Theodore Geisel |