Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:29:23 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= <jonny@jonny.eng.br> Cc: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Subject: Re: Mirror Site Requirements - Final Draft? Message-ID: <20030727202923.GD11351@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> In-Reply-To: <3F24313F.7040109@jonny.eng.br> References: <20030727192724.GA10869@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <3F24313F.7040109@jonny.eng.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 05:08:31PM -0300, Joo Carlos Mendes Lus wrote:
> And isn't once a day too much for
> something that generally do not changes after beeing released?
That I'm "waffling" over. :-/
If the mirror-announce@ list works well enough then syncing once a
day for mostly static data is, as you point out, wasteful. But
once a week would be too much of a delay at Release Time. I'm
inclined to leave this requirement as-is for now and review it
later, after mirror-announce@ has been in place for a while.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030727202923.GD11351>