From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Jul 13  7:31:18 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mrelay.jrc.it (mrelay.jrc.it [139.191.1.65])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40ACD15345
	for <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 07:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nick.hibma@jrc.it)
Received: from elect8 (elect8.jrc.it [139.191.71.152])
	by mrelay.jrc.it (LMC5692) with SMTP id QAA13522; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:30:24 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:30:22 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Nick Hibma <nick.hibma@jrc.it>
X-Sender: n_hibma@elect8
Reply-To: Nick Hibma <nick.hibma@jrc.it>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bin/9064: [PATCH] propose adding `direct' option in fetch(3)
In-Reply-To: <xzpg12sd3t4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95q.990713163016.6764S-100000@elect8>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

 > >  This functionality belongs in the proxy library, not in fetch, 
 > >  so it is available for all programs, IMHO.
 > 
 > What proxy library?
 
Duh. I thought we used a shared library for that. Mea culpa.
 
 > Anyway, I have a replacement for fetch(1) in the pipeline. It's just
 > that I seem to have this *thumb* stuck up my *butt*... :)
 
Any hint on what is different, better, faster, more colorful, and does
it make coffee? 
 
Nick




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message