From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 23 18:18:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9756937B479 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA10844; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 10:48:15 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200010232012.e9NKCLx14396@mail.ipeg.com> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 10:48:15 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: dmitry Subject: Re: xfmail and 4.1.1-STABLE Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Lanny Baron Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 23-Oct-00 dmitry wrote: > up". I was using vm under XEmacs for a long time, and I was looking for > something new to try. I came to liking mh a lot. I use nmh and I run exmh > (X11 > Tcl/Tk interface for it) on top of it. > Anyway, if someone knows why xfmail coredumps, I'd like to know as well. Most of the crashes occur in the bowels of the tookit (xforms) which is binary only (wonderful hey :) There is a project going to rewrite xfmail called archimedes on sourceforge.. What is really odd is that on a 2.2.8 machine xfmail is *much* more stable than on a 4.x or -current machine. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message