From owner-freebsd-security Thu Aug 26 10:17:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F4814C04 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:17:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.3/frmug-2.5/nospam) with UUCP id TAA02931 for freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 19:13:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix, from userid 101) id DDA84870A; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 08:21:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 08:21:21 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: undelete Message-ID: <19990826082121.A53241@keltia.freenix.fr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG References: <99Aug26.113851est.40335@border.alcanet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.95.5i In-Reply-To: ; from David Scheidt on Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 10:06:15PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT/ELF ctm#5543 AMD-K6 MMX @ 200 MHz Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to David Scheidt: > What, exactly, is broken with LFS? Or, at least, when did it get broken? Apart from the fact that it was never finished, it didn't survive the unified VM/buffer cache that went in just after FreeBSD 2.0 in '95. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #73: Sat Jul 31 15:36:05 CEST 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message