From owner-freebsd-security Tue Jul 25 21: 0: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAC337BDD4 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 20:59:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA16019; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 13:59:40 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200007260359.NAA16019@cairo.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: log with dynamic firewall rules To: stephen@math.missouri.edu (Stephen Montgomery-Smith) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 13:59:40 +1000 (Australia/NSW) Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <397E5342.16736F51@math.missouri.edu> from "Stephen Montgomery-Smith" at Jul 25, 2000 09:56:02 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In some mail from Stephen Montgomery-Smith, sie said: > > Ah, well this shows my patchy knowledge. I didn't even know about > ipf until I read your post. I'll go read the man pages. > > Would running both ipfw and ipf be considered over the top? Depends on your level of paranoia :-) But running IP Filter on a Solaris box with Firewall-1 wouldn't be "over the top" :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message