From nobody Sat Jul 26 07:16:34 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bpwz122p3z63B0K for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2025 07:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smtp-relay-int-backup.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int-backup.realworks.nl [87.255.56.188]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4bpwyz2vT2z3NFL for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2025 07:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=klop.ws header.s=rw2 header.b=bMhtRZ1y; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ronald-lists@klop.ws designates 87.255.56.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ronald-lists@klop.ws; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=klop.ws Received: from smtp-relay-int-backup.realworks.nl (crmpreview8.colo2.realworks.nl [10.2.52.38]) by mailrelayint1.colo2.realworks.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bpwyq4HRnz1hr; Sat, 26 Jul 2025 09:16:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=rw2; t=1753514195; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=EkeNrWOWMWilOjajRcDyJBBF+MUvfttIkqyCctZAZjM=; b=bMhtRZ1y7auDfm5psyRd9IXqDGWi+Nu7Hic7+c6Jwgu2ZnKbhtK7N0B8MIF+kgvbLJhKJA kUHMVofvSy1JQm4tTELPkWixKP90m8B5hp3tGl7UNvkqdwsy03QISLkGIL1/FfusFadmI0 kasqiJVHI1d84Nii3DhNaTdxDPJrYKf0cJUETjQQtX+WQXv/3Bb79FOK8xB2CRYwLDdtFn sgoSDAsFXKhfveIWYx/Y5/TCEtyeQ2qtW3lvufaVZoKEnB/1Gn+5XhOsopp4XxxFxEPgMd XJ7PvwpgB3ryOIBEFUKuEtJo4DiMlR8GYHptxdf4XIo8nhb3DVqD1WgfAmOoMA== Received: from crmpreview8.colo2.realworks.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by crmpreview8.colo2.realworks.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C16F2C0420; Sat, 26 Jul 2025 09:16:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 09:16:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Ronald Klop To: void Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <344207285.10975.1753514194049@localhost> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: about cloned_interfaces in /etc/rc.conf List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10974_1839178595.1753514193999" X-Mailer: Realworks (758.58) X-Originating-Host: from (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by crmpreview8.colo2.realworks.nl [10.2.52.38] with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jul 2025 09:16:34 +0200 Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.39 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.89)[-0.891]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[klop.ws,quarantine]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[klop.ws:s=rw2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:87.255.56.128/26]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:38930, ipnet:87.255.32.0/19, country:NL]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[f-m.fm]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[klop.ws:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4bpwyz2vT2z3NFL X-Spamd-Bar: --- ------=_Part_10974_1839178595.1753514193999 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Van: void Datum: 24 juli 2025 13:44 Aan: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Onderwerp: about cloned_interfaces in /etc/rc.conf > > > Hi net@, > > I'd like two bridges on a dual NIC system running -current. > > If it had a single bridge, it would be like > > (snip) > cloned_interfaces="bridge0 tap0 tap1" > (snip) > > But if there's two bridges, different networks (one routable, one not) > then is > (snip) > cloned_interfaces="bridge0 bridge1 tap0 tap1 tap2 tap3" > > correct? > -- > > > > > Looks good to me. I have something similar in my config. Regards, Ronald ------=_Part_10974_1839178595.1753514193999 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Van: void <void@f-m.fm>
Datum: 24 juli 2025 13:44
Aan: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: about cloned_interfaces in /etc/rc.conf

Hi net@,

I'd like two bridges on a dual NIC system running -current.

If it had a single bridge, it would be like

(snip)
cloned_interfaces="bridge0 tap0 tap1"
(snip)

But if there's two bridges, different networks (one routable, one not)
then is
(snip)
cloned_interfaces="bridge0 bridge1 tap0 tap1 tap2 tap3"

correct?
-- 



Looks good to me.
I have something similar in my config.

Regards,
Ronald
------=_Part_10974_1839178595.1753514193999--