From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 2 15:48:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AED49E for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 15:48:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w8hdkim@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349158FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 15:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so5078789vba.13 for ; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 08:48:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+aRnHkypFnRR0Ysw+i85iMzo5cZ3wk0O8DLl1lr4Cic=; b=wVPCwwVfl+daz4qa7PALkuRnkADsm/KD0VuR6F/1t0sKouWO/5CHUzT6HYtDkp/lzv U8Dlkjxsxzu2Y8/SN8Y7Eap3juhmiM4matAfcfubUpl2G07Hdyy2dmhrwnjI6o6dTdxL qFUBcwy2AfUPImKaSdDYue8deslJWDIHcKid3GttTCwkJb08NAyhpi3YsaC0BLmMgQuv YwLN8FKZZbSe0hi+5N4pKy3+WFd7kjK0l6fvYMsi3UUP5AFumuq61HtEP6tvPqk9Z07x rTdCsNoRpcVD2P0hxZXD1Piepu33SURO9yueZVxV85WHuU3M6303SDMMzMxFgT24Y+mR gZDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.94.225 with SMTP id df1mr1850896vdb.114.1351871292600; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 08:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.226.163 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 08:48:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20121030121924.GD70741@FreeBSD.org> <20121031123746.GR70741@glebius.int.ru> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:48:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Interfaces connected by bridge(4) do not pass arp replies From: Kim Culhan To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:48:13 -0000 On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:28:48AM -0400, Kim Culhan wrote: > K> Thanks for that, so far the working revision has been found in r240826. > K> > K> Would anyone have a suggestion for a revision to try next ? > > Middle between r240826 and revision that didn't work for you. :) > > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. Searching for the revision which did not work, I started with a test machine at a revision which was working and tested several builds until the latest at the time: r242429, where it is still working. The 'non-working' machine was also updated to r242429 and it is still not working. For this update, the existing /usr/src tree was removed and a new tree checked-out, /usr/obj was removed before building. The working machine had 2 identical em interfaces, so removed one and installed it into the non-working machine replacing an re interface there. The em interface on the working machine looks like: em0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=4009b ether 00:15:17:93:95:c9 inet6 fe80::215:17ff:fe93:95c9%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active The identical type em interface on the non-working machine looks like: em0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=40098 ether 00:15:17:98:5f:e6 inet6 fe80::215:17ff:fe98:5fe6%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active Note the options on the cards are now different, how can I [re]enable RXCSUM,TXCSUM on the card which was moved? Any thoughts on what could be going on would be greatly appreciated. thanks -kim