From owner-cvs-all Sun Jun 9 23:18:52 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08B937B407; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 23:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id ABAC2AE027; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 23:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 23:18:49 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Alan Cox Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm vm_map.c Message-ID: <20020610061849.GI88163@elvis.mu.org> References: <200206100611.g5A6BkG16910@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200206100611.g5A6BkG16910@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Alan Cox [020609 23:12] wrote: > alc 2002/06/09 23:11:46 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/vm vm_map.c > Log: > o In vm_map_entry_create(), call uma_zalloc() with M_NOWAIT on system maps. > Submitted by: tegge Are you sure that is correct? Shouldn't we just propogate the WAIT flag down from the higher level allocation rather than _always_ doing a NOWAIT allocation? -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message