Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 21:26:27 -0400 From: Eric Ogren <eogren@earthlink.net> To: Ken Seggerman <suleyman@echonyc.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc's bad results on Celeron 500 running 3.3 RELEASE Message-ID: <20000513212626.A278@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0005132049400.11966-100000@echonyc.com>; from suleyman@echonyc.com on Sat, May 13, 2000 at 08:56:28PM -0400 References: <20000513200513.C11952@earthlink.net> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0005132049400.11966-100000@echonyc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmm. Well, since you're not using funky optimization options, we've now gone beyond my (very limited) compiler expertise. Hopefully, one of the GCC gurus will have an idea. Eric On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 08:56:28PM -0400, Ken Seggerman wrote: > Eric: > > Thanks for your reply: > > I have been using -v -Wall -O and -I to include a local header file. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000513212626.A278>