From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 5 01:49:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1452616A4CE; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:49:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from wrzx35.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (wrzx35.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.3.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DB543D1D; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:49:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from q@uni.de) Received: from wrzx30.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (wrzx30.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.1.30]) by wrzx35.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BE0C7517; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:49:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from virusscan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wrzx30.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA844C3B8; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:49:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from wrzx28.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (wrzx28.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.3.28]) by wrzx30.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A474C375; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:49:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from coyote.q.local (wwsx14.win-screen.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.253.14]) by mailmaster.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A84B616B; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:49:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from roadrunner.q.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roadrunner.q.local (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i250Ribw001577; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:27:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from q@roadrunner.q.local) Received: (from q@localhost) by roadrunner.q.local (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i250RhEp001576; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:27:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from q) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:27:43 +0100 From: Ulrich Spoerlein To: Kirill Ponomarew Message-ID: <20040305002743.GA791@galgenberg.net> Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew , freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org References: <200403042031.i24KVY7C057830@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403042031.i24KVY7C057830@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (Rechenzentrum Universitaet Wuerzburg) cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/63767: [MAINTAINER] irc/eggdrop: Add SSL support X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:49:25 -0000 --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 04.03.2004 at 12:31:34 -0800, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Is it not better to move PATCH_* knobs to WITH_SSL option. > The users should decide whether they need it or not. This would require two different sets of patches, because files/patch-* are affected by the SSL-Patch too. Now what shall I do? Provide two versions of nearly all the patch-?? files? Rework the SSL-Patch on my own and upload it somewhere? Or better take the whole files/* dir and provide a big FreeBSD.patch and FreeBSD-SSL.patch and upload them somewhere? Ulrich Spoerlein --=20 PGP Key ID: F0DB9F44 Get it while it's hot! PGP Fingerprint: F1CE D062 0CA9 ADE3 349B 2FE8 980A C6B5 F0DB 9F44 I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAR8l/mArGtfDbn0QRAkfRAJ9vW/udWDvAUZDWsFnp+bNC+fyy2gCeLIQB dJ0rt7lhmEOUwoAu1bWFH9Y= =SzjG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--