From owner-freebsd-security Tue Aug 21 12:19:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from webs1.accretive-networks.net (webs1.accretive-networks.net [207.246.154.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E556337B403 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:19:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davidk@accretivetg.com) Received: from localhost (davidk@localhost) by webs1.accretive-networks.net (8.11.1/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7LIEGf65638; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:14:16 -0700 (PDT) From: David Kirchner X-X-Sender: To: Matt Piechota Cc: Wes Peters , "Carroll, D. (Danny)" , Subject: Re: Silly crackers... NT is for kids... In-Reply-To: <20010821143517.L23909-100000@cithaeron.argolis.org> Message-ID: <20010821111226.Q38221-100000@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Matt Piechota wrote: > No No, on the realtime machine controllers (QNX), or OCR nodes that need > all the cpu cycles they can get. I'm talking about the [de|en]crypt on > the remote side, not the PC side. Every bit or performance matters, and > could be the difference between us and someone else getting a contract. This is what regular ol TCP clients & servers would be good for, using your own method of authentication. telnet isn't designed for file transfer. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message