From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec  7 07:09:24 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9FBAE16A4CE; Tue,  7 Dec 2004 07:09:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DA82D43D68; Tue,  7 Dec 2004 07:09:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB779Msw099249;
	Tue, 7 Dec 2004 08:09:22 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= <jspedron@club-internet.fr>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:04:38 +0100."
             <41B48316.90004@club-internet.fr> 
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 08:09:22 +0100
Message-ID: <99248.1102403362@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: panic: Inconsistent vnode bufstrategy 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 07:09:24 -0000

In message <41B48316.90004@club-internet.fr>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P
=E9dron?= writes:

>In file systems like ufs, msdosfs or ext2fs, VOP_BMAP will do:
>	*ap->a_bop = &VTOI(ap->a_vp)->i_devvp->v_bufobj;
>So the vm will call the device bo_strategy callback, and everything works.
>
>In NTFS, VOP_BMAP is different:
>	*ap->a_bop = &ap->a_vp->v_bufobj;
>The goal is that the vm should call the file system's VOP_STRATEGY, not 
>the device directly (that's what I guess, I'm not familiar with this fs :-).

Spot on, now for an encore, can you also create a patch to fix this ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.