From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 29 19:10:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987EF106564A for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.253.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585778FC14 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (rideseveral.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.160.231]) by mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p8TJAINv023410 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:10:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1317323419; bh=q5ohMFLIpJ3qYpWlYqthXg64m9c0QnQ32DMj/FLyQ08=; h=Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ZCyoFyIWGYX7ph+cJ8hloZJExPO/wvQdZjOrE200xiEqzGyRvWiQzOtFioOUgZYl4 UYj6xU6W21vW7kSWBk709QskWAiezXEiLSFCgQfZGvml8hX7hKokSE5TOtEoem/0Zs N6NCPDojbDq7lBmI31fzIlObAvzU41ejnAvQaKh8= From: Sean Bruno To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <1317315666.2777.8.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> References: <1317315666.2777.8.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:10:18 -0700 Message-ID: <1317323418.2777.14.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: bce(4) with IPMI X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:10:34 -0000 On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 10:01 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > We've been getting reports of odd behavior on our Dell R410 machines > when trying to use IPMI. The servers have two NIC's that we have > assigned as the IPMI interface(bce0) and production interface(bce1) > respectively. > > Since we don't actually configure bce0 in FreeBSD, we've found that the > IPMI interface deactivated when bce(4) loads. I assume that the driver > is not initializing the interface correctly in this case and the default > case is to turn the interface off. Does it make sense to completely > turn off the interface when there is an active link on the port, but no > configuration assigned? > > Sean > > p.s. Dell's IPMI implementation is ... um ... more difficult than it > needs to be. > I should probably say, this is freebsd7. So I'll peruse the changelogs and see if 7 is missing something here. sean