From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  2 10:13:45 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF46DD31;
 Tue,  2 Apr 2013 10:13:45 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384A47B1;
 Tue,  2 Apr 2013 10:13:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y10so2944527wgg.0
 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 03:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
 :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=PuK42h39W2ZoDLGvlDN5G5Nx6mwRhBVughQxtzvF0V8=;
 b=c2ebSkVmeSVr2X5T5PaXvPoV5ZtYUQ5xwK/gcg7lFFVZ8Lu3YQVxd+496xbnbruicz
 Te9niw+q42UjSMslzTKQrRidj1iEDAiPfj7tCBW1gAhtvEjIRIrr73tzAIdNORTXbhqF
 C0oyiwusvKcBBkZeQszR4kJt1udBlEM8EqywB6ADa4WmMp1NXS/6q1pFOt/u0/wLpBB8
 ZVQaH/MrAb5NLjDqUdKDNh561DOPpzOe+iC1bI6nGAjaFdkQatzDNib0Eh9cYe+XJytX
 CG74dLRhdEUrDuYgpHQZ+r1OAeRTjgeY6rKUOhHHAzomTNDHCirQpxk6jLMuM5xRXdsf
 8ijQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.90.116 with SMTP id bv20mr3381183wib.32.1364897624348;
 Tue, 02 Apr 2013 03:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.139.72 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 03:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOgwaMt0to0SnzwqSOuDAk-Yw1mUrooUPVYYXCUSxY7=hgY9SQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF6rxgnYOwAPnpykTAN-Eu=oeee_uBMt1ud8U4RpyKLO5S257Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOgwaMt2Qvt8c4YvRLJ23sqpODvb00XgwY7Czr+JVALXmK1wLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304011802360.97433@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
 <944760435.20130401210118@serebryakov.spb.ru>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304012031370.98303@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
 <8638v9e22j.fsf@ds4.des.no>
 <CAOgwaMt0to0SnzwqSOuDAk-Yw1mUrooUPVYYXCUSxY7=hgY9SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 13:13:44 +0300
Message-ID: <CA+7WWSeQc3MTRikStJCVBJt30gDhOoNAu1A6NTUfhZ+fKegUQg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture
From: Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com>
To: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org>,
 FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>,
 Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>,
 Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:13:46 -0000

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
<m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> wro=
te:
>
>> Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> writes:
>> > Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> > > It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some
>> > > firmwares are 64-bit CPU.
>> > don't know of any now in shops that are not
>>
>> http://soekris.com/products/net5501.html
>> http://soekris.com/products/net6501.html
>>
>> DES
>> --
>> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
>>
>
>
> I am NOT able to understand the merit of these products with respect to
> their features and PRICES .
>
> It is possible to assemble much more cheaper full featured PC like system=
s
> ( DDR3 memory , 64-bit capable processors , with a disadvantage about pow=
er
> requirements ) .
>
>


Power consumption.