From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 21:18:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D96431B4 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56842767 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 13E4D33C25; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:18:12 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best way to make the port install another port References: Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:18:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Torfinn Ingolfsen's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:51:48 +0100") Message-ID: <441u2lb9po.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:18:13 -0000 Torfinn Ingolfsen writes: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Big Lebowski wrote: >> >> Just bumping it in a hope of someone actually knowing the answer... > > Look at one of the existing meta-ports to see how it is done. > For example: /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4 My reading of the original message is that the poster knew about RUN_DEPENDS and OPTIONS, but wasn't comfortable combining the two for reasons that weren't really clear. Nonetheless, I'm pretty sure that is what he should do.