From owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 27 19:26:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168D116A4CE for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 19:26:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ioskeha.hittite.isp.9tel.net (ioskeha.hittite.isp.9tel.net [62.62.156.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88C643D41 for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 19:26:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from clefevre-lists@9online.fr) Received: from pc2k (unknown [80.119.167.76]) by ioskeha.hittite.isp.9tel.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 15AD017B464; Fri, 28 May 2004 04:27:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <016c01c4445b$3135f930$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> From: "Cyrille Lefevre" To: "John E Hein" , "Sevag Krikorian" References: <16566.7366.183103.44216@gromit.timing.com><20040528000450.31550.qmail@web14705.mail.yahoo.com> <16566.34591.269364.918740@gromit.timing.com> Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 04:26:32 +0200 Organization: ACME MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-small Subject: Re: where can I get the latest version of picoBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-small@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 02:26:49 -0000 "John E Hein" wrote: > Sevag Krikorian wrote at 17:04 -0700 on May 27, 2004: > > --- John E Hein wrote: > > > Signal 11 is often an indication of hardware > > > problems (mem, > > > overheating). Have you tried a different memory > > > stick? > > > How much memory? > > > > I have 98 mb on that box. > > That is more than enough. > You could try running with just one memory stick to isolate > potentially bad memory. > > Just because win95 (et. al.) seemed to worked okay (or as well as > win95 CAN work) could just mean it's not tickling a memory problem > that does exist. let's try http://www.memtest86.com/, the definitive memory tester :) Cyrille Lefevre. -- home: mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net