Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 21:52:30 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251117] [NEW PORT] www/palemoon: Open-source web browser Message-ID: <bug-251117-7788-HMIli8jcVt@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251117-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251117-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251117 --- Comment #9 from Olivier Certner <olivier.freebsd@free.fr> --- (In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #4) Hi, Thanks for taking this. Yes, I know about these warnings. Most of them seem moot to me: They descri= be situations for which what I did is exactly what is intented. E.g., USE_GCC mentions 9, because I want this precise version and no other (and, in particular, more recent ones). For the order of the different Makefile's statement, I mostly followed the guidelines, but found that for some reason, IIRC, no order makes all warnin= gs disappear (I remember suspecting some bug in portlint). And some of the suggested changes are clearly semantically wrong, such as moving UXP_VERSION elsewhere: I want it to be adjacent to DISTVERSION as a clear reminder that= it must be changed in sync with it. Also, there is the required include at the end, but it is followed by some manipulation of RUN_DEPENDS that must be do= ne after it (see bug #211154). If you insist, I could regenerate the patches using 'make makepatch'. If you know of whatever way to remove some warnings, or you have advices on= the Makefile, given what I've said, I'm all ears. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251117-7788-HMIli8jcVt>