Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Sep 2002 17:18:40 +0200
From:      Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz>
To:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: named rejecting all kinds of serials
Message-ID:  <20020928151840.GV30361@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
In-Reply-To: <200209281348.g8SDm0aQ085852@lurza.secnetix.de>
References:  <19116172.1033221870@tot.in.t-online.fr> <200209281348.g8SDm0aQ085852@lurza.secnetix.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# olli@secnetix.de / 2002-09-28 15:48:00 +0200:
> Bye the way, RFC 1912 is definitely recommended reading for
> anybody who operates a name server or who is responsible
> for zone files.

    Heh, RFC 1912 (and the others) are definitely recommended reading
    for anybody who operates the BIND name server, because these RFCs
    are very BIND specific. BIND is not DNS just like Sendmail is not
    SMTP.

    Your advice was actually very much to the point, Janine obviously
    runs BIND. I just find it hilarious that RFCs are a viable way of
    documenting an implementation (as opposed to a principle).

-- 
begin 666 nonexistent.vbs
FreeBSD 4.7-RC
5:07PM up 11 days, 22 mins, 13 users, load averages: 0.13, 0.06, 0.01
end

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020928151840.GV30361>