From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 2 21:44:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33E016A4CE for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 21:44:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from orthanc.ca (orthanc.ca [209.89.70.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3296843D70 for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 21:44:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca) Received: from d216-232-211-96.bchsia.telus.net (d216-232-211-96.bchsia.telus.net [216.232.211.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by orthanc.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j42Li2Th042627 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 May 2005 15:44:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca) Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 14:44:01 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg To: Peter Jeremy , Alex Zbyslaw Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20050429200029.GC232@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <200504262010.49509@harrymail> <86k6mo0xmh.fsf@xps.des.no> <427157B7.6040203@mac.com> <200504290053.51912@harrymail> <427177FD.50809@dial.pipex.com> <20050429200029.GC232@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0b1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-DCC-dcc.uncw.edu-Metrics: orthanc.ca 1201; Body=4 Fuz1=4 Fuz2=4 X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on orthanc.ca X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 May 2005 11:42:11 +0000 cc: Emanuel Strobl cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: groff alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 21:44:24 -0000 --On 2005-4-30 6:00 AM +1000 Peter Jeremy wrote: > I don't believe the nroff in either 4.3BSD or 2.11BSD can support long > names and neither include a mdoc(7) implementation. 4.4BSD includes > mdoc(7) but also GNU groff - though a quick look at the tmac.mdoc* > files suggests that it might work with an old (4.3 or 2.11) nroff. When the Solaris 10 source is released there will be an up-to-date alternative to groff. I'm planning to switch over to the Solaris troff ASAP. I've already started fixing mdoc to work with ditroff on another Solaris 10 box. --lyndon