From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan  2 17:57:54 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A19133
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Jan 2013 17:57:54 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com)
Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com
 [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1422C196D
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Jan 2013 17:57:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com
 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); 
 Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:57:48 -0800
Message-ID: <50E4751A.2040501@a1poweruser.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:57:46 -0500
From: Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Subject: Re: is csup broken?
References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com>
 <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E4539E.7050803@a1poweruser.com>
 <20130102164728.abc6cc34.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com>
 <20130102113813.2e9d42cf@tech304.office.supranet.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130102113813.2e9d42cf@tech304.office.supranet.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 17:57:48.0921 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[AD43FE90:01CDE912]
X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com
X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com]
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:57:54 -0000

Mark Felder wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:08:24 -0500
> fbsd8@a1poweruser.com wrote:
> 
>> This 9.1 release was released prematurely. It has more problems
>> them 5.0 had which had a re-release 2 weeks later to fix problems.
> 
> This is FUD. Stop being afraid of change.
> 
> Users use portsnap
> Power users use svn
> 
> There's no use trying to cover everyone's edge cases. You'll never keep everyone happy.
> 
>> Now I just had a port I maintain committed yesterday
>> and I have no way to test it to verify the port is working.
> 
> Please don't commit ports to the ports tree if you have not tested them!
> 
> 
Hay cutting out part of the post to make things look different than they 
are is just wrong.
As the thread explains the situation which you conveniently cut out.

If my words were not clear. My port works at my end, but I also check 
that the comment port process does not get kinked messing up the port at 
the ports system end.