From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Oct 13 10:40:57 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA09654
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 10:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA09649
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 10:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from julian@whistle.com)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA12872;
	Mon, 13 Oct 1997 10:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22)
 via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd012870; Mon Oct 13 17:32:24 1997
Message-ID: <34425ADB.41C67EA6@whistle.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 10:31:07 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Organization: Whistle Communications
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: itojun@itojun.org
CC: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: good name for a (in fact 2) new module(s)
References: <25477.876737185@coconut.itojun.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

itojun@itojun.org wrote:
> 
>         A bit off-topic, but I can't resist:
>         will netinet/netatalk be heavily changed by the addition of
>         netgraph, or they are just another (separate) protocol family?
> 

they are untouched

> itojun