From owner-freebsd-emulation  Wed Mar 26 17:42:15 1997
Return-Path: <owner-emulation>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA21425
          for emulation-outgoing; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 17:42:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thelab.hub.org (hal-ns1-05.netcom.ca [207.181.94.69])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA21406
          for <freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 17:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thelab.hub.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thelab.hub.org (8.8.5/8.8.2) with SMTP id VAA09966; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 21:41:24 -0400 (AST)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 21:41:24 -0400 (AST)
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
cc: gclarkii@main.gbdata.com, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Latest doscmd report
In-Reply-To: <199703270132.MAA04451@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96.970326214047.2621Z-100000@thelab.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, Michael Smith wrote:

> > 	Make install also doesn't seem to work, and my experience with bsdmake
> > Makefile's is so limited as to be non-existent:
> 
> 'make install' is _intentionally_ broken for the moment, as I don't want 
> people installing it assuming that it's "ready" for anything yet 8)
>
	What's the difference between pcemu and doscmd?  Other then the
fact that pcemu I could get to work :(