From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 03:32:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0761721 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 03:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f180.google.com (mail-we0-f180.google.com [74.125.82.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C9E8FC0C for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 03:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id t57so6082752wey.11 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:32:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=N1jNg1+sIWUnufsRbQFDPJ7XQf4pJdE79WywXKIJhEk=; b=Qlg+rIQXuy7U5gAPnnnhGeu/jRJX1uedV34Ay3KGikLsl9luTacMZHwCXhn4O3Hg4c WoiHaf+Pg7R6+d/4FenUA66XR9bJwHZZMSI2V5O6nwPQRdhsSk6Og2zc0vz0WROg0me5 1OEUfFV/EX8llKZgQzTh5w8bDmH7JREPzyrD2dUj582HIgAeKXMBxd2lEm/DjvXZrX/5 92L5gkcr6xCTaUoQ8cZ+/FNxK4CU4f0U/PUIPnRikUDsnnFrYdo/W3/hwYSC/nDZ+yqR v0El5imkkl+T0WrSJRoKkI0JXj9XQcutco+HfmVKlHt+UES5PjQrAknebe/WuFMRmalT ZkOA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.21.70 with SMTP id t6mr66588586wje.42.1357011144683; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:32:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.172.197 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:32:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50E239FE.4080802@mu.org> References: <50E1D012.1040004@missouri.edu> <20121231175808.GA1399@glenbarber.us> <6817fb4c15659b194cc658b1dfa58a31.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <50E2063A.9070706@mu.org> <50E239FE.4080802@mu.org> Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 05:32:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Does / Is anyone maintaining CVS for FreeBSD? From: Kimmo Paasiala To: Alfred Perlstein Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Chris H X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 03:32:34 -0000 On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> There are arguments on both sides; some (perhaps you) feel SVN has/ >> provides more options, others (maybe myself) feel the same can be >> accomplished with CVS, and that migration only causes more initial >> (and unnecessary) overhead. I'll leave it at that. :) > > Chris, > > I think you've gotten to your NYE jubilations a bit early. > > Sure the same can be accomplished by CVS, the same way a mission to the moon > could be accomplished with enough black powder and a sailing ship. > > It just won't be a pleasant trip. > > Go finish whatever you're drinking and have a great 2013. > > When you wake up, go crack a book on SVN and you'll only be living in 2007. > > > -Alfred > Anyone who has had the "pleasure" of being an admin charge of a CVS repository will not want to go back to it after discovering what SVN and GIT have to offer. Just my 2c -Kimmo