From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 5 20:06:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65679106566B for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:06:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk (tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk [80.68.91.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282B98FC16 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195E4489A4; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:06:25 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk Received: from tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g6BJ21UHDt6v; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:06:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from rita.nodomain (unknown [192.168.205.6]) by tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771A04896C; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:06:20 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4ACA519B.1040907@tomjudge.com> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:05:47 +0000 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> References: <4ACA0549.7030404@tomjudge.com> <4ACA2E0F.5010800@elischer.org> <4ACA3146.9090402@tomjudge.com> <4ACA4B49.70702@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4ACA4B49.70702@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Per Jail Memory Limits X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:06:26 -0000 Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > The original JailResourceLimits patch was never 100% functional. > > Please see this page http://wiki.freebsd.org/Jails with links to newer > attempts for 7.x and 8.x. > > It is also better to discuss it on Jail mailinglist > freebsd-jail@freebsd.org and you can find some useful informations in > archive http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/ > > I am unhappy that there are people with some interest in to jail > resource limits, some patches floating around, but it never arive at > final stage and production quality, and never get committed. :( > > It would be nice to have jails with CPU / memory / FD / disk IO / > bandwidth limits connected to SNMP monitoring of these resources. > Unfortunately I have zero C coding skills, so I can just wait if > somebody... > > Miroslav Lachman Thanks, I will take a look at the patches here (just testing the 7.0 patch on 7.1 now). It would be nice to see some of this functionality, in the base system. Tom