Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 16:44:57 +0000 From: "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/make job.c job.h main.c make.1 make.c Message-ID: <20020413164457.GA8591@FreeBSD.ORG> In-Reply-To: <20020413151913.GB26522@FreeBSD.ORG> References: <200204131218.g3DCI0Z68354@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020413123044.GB13221@FreeBSD.ORG> <20020413053330.A96771@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020413151913.GB26522@FreeBSD.ORG>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 03:19:13PM +0000, J. Mallett wrote: > > Thoughts? If that seems reasonable I'll post my diffs relative to NetBSD > make(1) should I not run into some place where it pukes. If anyone knows > of a place where NetBSD's make(1) has been known not to work with what we > need it to work with, please let me know so I can try to fix that. > I just got through a buildworld, so I decided it's time to post the diffs. I'm going to run it with our make(1) now, and compare performance. If there is not a significant boost, and if there aren't things in NetBSD that stand out as things we want, I'm not sure whether it's worth it or not. I like the ability to use ODE :@<variable>@<string>@, but that's neither here nor there. The diffs explain: http://people.freebsd.org/~jmallett/NetBSD.make.diff Again, these are relative to NetBSD -rHEAD. -- jmallett@FreeBSD.org | C, MIPS, POSIX, UNIX, BSD, IRC Geek. http://www.FreeBSD.org | The Power to Serve "We all need mirrors to remind ourselves who we are -- I'm no different." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020413164457.GA8591>