From owner-freebsd-isp  Mon Aug  4 15:32:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA02115
          for isp-outgoing; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 15:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from news.cioe.com (news.cioe.com [204.120.165.34])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA02109
          for <isp@freebsd.org>; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 15:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by news.cioe.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) id RAA24766
	for isp@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 17:32:16 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 17:32:16 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Ames <steve@news.cioe.com>
Message-Id: <199708042232.RAA24766@news.cioe.com>
To: isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: front page .. which compat
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Since there is no FreeBSD binary of the front page extensions (something
> that I really think Microsoft should remedy...), which version do I use?
> 
> I tried the BSDI ones (thinking that freebsd had binary compatibility
> with BSDI), but they didn't go... should I try the linux ones next?
> 

	I'm using the BSDI extensions on FreeBSD 2.2 Stable, but also used
	them back on version 2.1.5 which I think was the earliest version
	that supported the bsdi format.

Yeah... never mind, I'm an idiot sometimes... poor eyesite. I downloaded
'alpha' not 'bsdi'. *sigh* When will I ever follow my own mott:
Trust, but verify.

						-Steve