From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 22:12:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758BB10656DF for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325BA8FC1F for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275) id CA5E77309E; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 23:17:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 23:17:19 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Ben Kaduk Message-ID: <20090102221719.GA61058@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <20090101183026.GA15385@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <6101e8c40901011117y3e82a226id6f9de940b0f7dcd@mail.gmail.com> <47d0403c0901011619r658fd25ct3d01bc32969bde11@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47d0403c0901011619r658fd25ct3d01bc32969bde11@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: current@freebsd.org, Oliver Pinter Subject: Re: RFC: new utility, kmodpatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:12:29 -0000 On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 07:19:12PM -0500, Ben Kaduk wrote: > On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Do You think for this project: http://www.ksplice.com/ ? > > > > On 1/1/09, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > >> I mentioned this utility a couple of months ago, and it's now working > >> so i would like to receive feedback on whether this is good to have > >> as part of the system, or just keep it as a port (which is what > >> i plan to do by default). > >> > >> In a nutshell, the kmodpatch utility can print or alter the content > >> of device/quirk tables in kernel modules (I think Linux has some > >> similar tool, though i don't remember the name -- or perhaps it is > >> a feature of insmod ?). > >> > > > Ksplice is not yet in the linux kernel tree, so it's probably not > what Luigi was referring to. However, it is a pretty impressive correct, i think there is some feature (in insmod or whatever the utility to load a module is) to configure the module so it uses certain variables (perhaps including recognising a given USB vendor-id pair?) cheers luigi