From owner-freebsd-security Fri Nov 12 10:10:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu (broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu [128.84.247.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C841E14F43 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 1999 10:10:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU) Received: from graphics.cornell.edu by broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA008670229; Fri, 12 Nov 1999 13:10:29 -0500 Message-Id: <199911121810.AA008670229@broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Josef Karthauser Cc: Brett Glass , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why not sandbox BIND? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:33:06 GMT." <19991112173306.D76708@florence.pavilion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 13:10:28 -0500 From: Mitch Collinsworth Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> Our production systems are running an older version of FreeBSD (we >> always stay a bit behind the leading edge), so they do not have >> that user. > >You are _quite_ a way behind. I believe that almost all of the 3.X releases >have had this ability. This is _quite_ an exaggeration. It's not in 3.0-R, which came out this calendar year. It's in 3.2-R but I'm not sure about 3.1-R. Don't have one of those handy to check. -Mitch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message