From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 01:47:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4306F16A40F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:47:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juhasaarinen@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5281B43CA2 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:46:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from juhasaarinen@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1318120wxc for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:47:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LAvyf8lYQ+FL03To+81bJEWrvuIzZ4ysYL0EEGKCsLApVeJeB8hvJP9UPQWbSRIhZ9T6i5kDZX64V7SYAtZojVSre5sm0FN5VsQ8PGGW0ioLN/8MQSictTTozMc9oQDjLO5llPWpHqvn5G31AXrXd1uHJcASokrjKuPmTG9+ykk= Received: by 10.70.39.2 with SMTP id m2mr11254968wxm.1165801653003; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:47:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.24.18 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:47:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:47:32 +1300 From: "Juha Saarinen" To: RW In-Reply-To: <200612110100.26229.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> <200612110100.26229.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:47:35 -0000 On 12/11/06, RW wrote: > As I understand it the argument in favour of smaller kernels isn't that they > free-up memory for other uses, it's that they make better uses of memory > cache. > > OTOH big blocks of code that are rarely entered probably aren't going to > degrade performance much. Security through less code? Hmm, dunno. -- Juha http://www.geekzone.co.nz/juha