From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  1 16:49:46 2015
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id F0C617BE; Wed,  1 Apr 2015 16:49:46 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:49:46 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r369643 - head/misc/getopt
Message-ID: <20150401164946.GA6756@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201409301619.s8UGJg6b078754@svn.freebsd.org>
 <543844FA.1010908@FreeBSD.org> <551ADD5F.1060004@FreeBSD.org>
 <551BCF17.2050303@FreeBSD.org> <20150401110943.GA82458@FreeBSD.org>
 <551C2019.5010904@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <551C2019.5010904@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org>,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:49:47 -0000

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 11:43:05AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 4/1/2015 6:09 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > (To Bryan) nothing to be sorry about.  Trivially avoidable fuckups
> > should not be tolerated.
> 
> Yes people must test. I still feel I overreacted though. Especially
> considering I don't test my own changes on every release/arch.

Me as well (about "on every release/arch").  Nothing like a blunt, honest
response wakes your confident ass from "ah, it should be fine" swamp. :)

> > [...] On a related note, I see the line QAT in every commit message
> > that leads nowhere.  Why don't we fix that thing, or remove stale and
> > non-working link?
> 
> I will remove it for now.

Thanks ('twas bothering me for a while now).

./danfe