Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 02:32:53 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253334] [new port] net-im/tg_owt: webrtc library used by telegram-desktop Message-ID: <bug-253334-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253334 Bug ID: 253334 Summary: [new port] net-im/tg_owt: webrtc library used by telegram-desktop Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: henry.hu.sh@gmail.com Created attachment 222255 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D222255&action= =3Dedit patch for the new port This is a port of https://github.com/desktop-app/tg_owt net-im/telegram-desktop now uses the tg_owt library from github.com/desktop-app/tg_owt (also created by the same developers). This library was downloaded and compiled together with telegram-desktop in = the previous version. In this version, this library has its own sub-modules. Gi= ven its complexity, I think that it would be better to create a separate port f= or it. This library is kind of different from other libraries telegram-desktop use. Other libraries are mostly configured as sub-modules of the git repo, and they're included in the -full.tar.gz source tarball. tg_owt is different: telegram-desktop's own build script seems to just grab the latest version a= nd build it. tg_owt has no release, and no tag. Thus, the port version is using the date= . In the future, if it has named releases, we can use that. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-253334-7788>