From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 23 11:23:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6141D16A4CE for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2E543D1D for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:23:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fj@panix.com) Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3734898F; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:23:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from fj@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i3NINbo17163; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:23:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:23:37 -0400 From: Joe Altman To: Killermink! Message-ID: <20040423182337.GB12453@panix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Altman , Killermink! , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: updated ports tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:23:39 -0000 On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:04:06PM +0000, Killermink ! wrote: > Hello all, > > I am about to (re)install FreeBSD 5.2.1, and wish to make sure I have the > latest ports afterwards. I do not really wish to install the whole ports > tree from sysinstall as disk space is at a premium, and i will (soon) have > a fast internet connection so seems pointless when i am only going to > install like 10 ports. Also, the ports tree on the 5.2.1 ISO is out of date > now. > > I have read the manual over and over, but cannot fathom how I can make a > port without the whole ports tree being installed... > > Is it possible to make a port in this way, and how is it done? If disk space is at a premium with an out of date ports tree, and ports were likely added in the interim, then disk space will still be an issue with a current ports tree, no? So you may want to: 1) use packages, and skip ports entirely or 2) install the ports tree, and update it as a part of a make world process.