From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 26 12:12:29 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE9D452;
 Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:12:29 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EEF8FC0C;
 Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:12:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from l9.suse.de (nat.nue.novell.com [195.135.221.2])
 by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BC8D3F410;
 Mon, 26 Nov 2012 07:12:27 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:12:25 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r307766 - head/sysutils/salt
In-Reply-To: <20121126061719.GC24378@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211261311390.2085@tuna.site>
References: <201211260604.qAQ649wY012225@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20121126061719.GC24378@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov <ak@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:12:29 -0000

On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> -WWW:	http://saltstack.org
>> +WWW: http://saltstack.org
> 
> Actually, it should be terminated with a slash as well.

Why?  http RFCs have clarified for more than a decade that the
presence or absence of a slash does not make a difference here.

Gerald