From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 11 15:16:21 2005 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG> X-Original-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E8516A41F; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:16:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dean@stack.nl) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C0143D45; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:16:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dean@stack.nl) Received: from snail.stack.nl (snail.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::131]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725B6A2FF2; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:16:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by snail.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 1600) id 67FE02287F; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:16:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:16:19 +0200 From: Dean Strik <dean@stack.nl> To: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> Message-ID: <20050911151619.GC15948@stack.nl> References: <E1EE0tD-000IXW-4V@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UFHRwCdBEJvubb2X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <E1EE0tD-000IXW-4V@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> X-Really: Yes User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Danny Howard <dannyman@toldme.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fibre Channel disks to two Systems? X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem <freebsd-scsi.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>, <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>, <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:16:21 -0000 --UFHRwCdBEJvubb2X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Danny Braniss wrote: > hi danny > you are asking too many questions :-), but w/r to netapp: > same computer, 1gbE, NFS is about 50% slower than FC. > btw, iSCSI (still beta) is only slightly faster than NFS > (note NFS is UDP, iSCSI is TCP). Of course NFS can be TCP as well. And must be TCP for NFSv4. > as to reliability, the netapp is worth avery penny (actualy K$ :-), had o= nly=20 > one major breakdown in over 10 years. Same experiences here, with lots of NetApps. I would however not be happy running PostgreSQL over NFS. With FC/iSCSI, no problem. --=20 Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology dean@stack.nl | dean@ipnet6.org | http://www.ipnet6.org/ "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli --UFHRwCdBEJvubb2X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDJEpD5Td/bYnvOAMRAjAeAJ0fqkAEa0fq9UBGJNRUYZ++4dt36wCfai/H 0s62PYd1Qw0abmjnMjz33pU= =aSVy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UFHRwCdBEJvubb2X--