From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 1 08:04:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98F616A4DD for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:04:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbq@anyware-tech.com) Received: from caraldi.com (195-13-58-165.oxyd.net [195.13.58.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A2143D46 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:04:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbq@anyware-tech.com) Received: from vision.anyware (10.21.96-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.96.21.10]) by caraldi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B59060E1 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:04:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by vision.anyware (Postfix, from userid 1021) id 6385A623C; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:04:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:04:40 +0200 From: Jean-Baptiste Quenot To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060801080439.GB70025@vision.anyware> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <970c0a6b0607280839qc05e2b8p51118955745b7cda@mail.gmail.com> <20060728155808.GI55747@vision.anyware> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF2054A8@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <970c0a6b0607312222j54352929i829de592c6d704fa@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <970c0a6b0607312222j54352929i829de592c6d704fa@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: Q) eclipse 3.2 (Callisto) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:04:41 -0000 * David Sledge: > I made the port directory eclipse3.2 so that eclipse 3.1.2 can > still be installed if people have problems with the new version. > [...] Also, would it be better to submit it as an update to the > existing eclipse port or leave it as a new port eclipse3.2? That is not a good idea to have two versions of Eclipse in our ports tree because there are 26 ports depending on Eclipse. So basically if you have two versions of Eclipse you'll have 54 ports to maintain instead of 27. AFAICT it is too big an effort for the FreeBSD Eclipse community. Best regards, -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/